|
More Writing,
Less Grading
The challenge of incorporating more
writing into your syllabus is that if you add more assignments you will
have to read and respond to all those papers. Though your students
might eventually write better with more opportunity to practice and more
guidance from you, instructors are for the most part already too busy to
take on the extra work. I suggest it is possible to ask your students to
write more, as long as you adapt your grading style.
Students presumably learn through reading and class discussion of course
materials, and then show you what they’ve learned by producing a paper
or research project. But you can also use informal, non-graded
assignments to allow students to show themselves what they’ve taken in
from lectures, discussion, and readings, especially at a point where
they may not have fully mastered the material. The idea is that you are
looking for understanding of concepts, rather than polished work. Such
work will not be assessed for grammar and correctness. Effortful but
faulty answers are also acceptable. Your grading may simply consist of
putting a check mark on it to note that it was handed in.
Rather than putting
comments on paper after paper, you can teach course concepts and writing
by featuring one or two exemplary papers. You can project them for the
whole class and discuss why these examples are worthwhile. You can also
use informal writing-to-learn assignments to show how ideas might be
developed further for a formal paper. You can show where unsubstantiated
assertions would need to be supported with evidence from the text, or
where transitions might be needed to connect several ideas.
Giving an
unannounced writing assignment can work to salvage a class where
discussion has sputtered and everyone is looking down at the table.
Likewise in discussions where some speakers are very heated and others
are apparently afraid to venture an opinion, asking the whole class to
write for ten minutes gives everyone a chance to commit to an opinion.
You can use a writing-to-learn assignment as homework, and start the
next class discussion by requiring students to read their essays. Used
in this way, there’s really no need to grade or comment on the writing,
or in some cases even to collect it. The writing-to-learn assignment
should strengthen the student’s connection between critical thinking and
writing, allow everyone to participate in class discussion, if only
silently, and force students to be responsible for their own learning by
having them produce their thoughts on paper.
Though many instructors do assign formal papers with graduated deadlines
for proposals, drafts, and finished products, students still often have
difficulty breaking their writing into steps and truly revising. When
students are given informal writing assignments with a very short
deadline, they are forced to produce rough drafts. If you then use the
drafts to show where revision should happen, then students begin to see
the difference between rough and polished work.
You can also
emphasize the difference between rough and polished work with your
approach to grading. Demand excellence of finished work—work that
has been thought through, revised, well documented, properly formatted,
edited, and proofread. Don’t penalize students for stumbling,
disorganized, horribly spelled and perhaps conceptually faulty rough
work, as long as it is prepared thoughtfully. This work is only a step
towards mastering the material. |
Faculty

Writing Center Hours
|