|
Writing a Literature Review
A literature review explores major themes
on a narrow topic by surveying scholarly journals. It summarizes
trends or findings, points out controversies, shows different
sides of an argument or different ways experts view the topic,
and makes links between related materials. It may also point out
where research is weak or lacking on a specific topic. A
literature review allows its reader to get a quick overview of
the topic. It may be an introductory part of a larger research
project, or one step along the way to writing a more
comprehensive analytical paper.
Begin with an open mind. You may have to
change your topic based on what you are able to find. You may
find a topic that interests you more than your original one
after you have done a bit of reading. You may have to narrow
your topic or widen your scope, depending on how much
information is available. Finding your topic thus might not be
your first step. It will more likely be your second step, after
an initial foray into the library.
You will need many journal articles to
write an adequate literature review, and you will most likely
collect many more articles than you can use. To keep your
research manageable, you need to read and take notes as you go.
Write notes directly on the front or margins of each article,
write them on a sticky note you can put right on the first page
of the article, or number your articles and keep notes in a
separate notebook or file. Take notes that do these three
things: 1) summarize, 2) assess, and 3) reflect.
Summarize – write three or four
sentences simply identifying what the article is about. If you
are unable to condense your summary to these few sentences, this
is a good indication that you don’t adequately understand it,
and you should read it again.
Assess—decide whether this is a
useful, reliable source. Is it objective, controversial? Is it
taking a side? Is it well-documented, and from a peer-reviewed
journal? Does it represent an eccentric point of view, or a
mainstream one? (If it’s not objective and not mainstream, you
can still use it. But you want to identify these things about
it.) What are the author’s strengths and weaknesses?
Reflect—note how this article
shapes your argument. Decide where it fits in with other
articles you’ve collected.
At this stage, you need to decide whether
you need all the research you’ve gathered, or whether you need
more. If your topic centers on a controversial topic, you want
to make sure your research presents all sides. Your source
materials may refer back to an earlier key piece of research.
Make sure you have that. Looking through the end notes of the
articles is a good way to find more material related to your
topic. You may find you have too much material, if a lot of it
is similar. Decide what you might get rid of, and look to fill
any gaps.
It may be very hard to sit down and write
with a big pile of research at your elbow. The best way to do it
is to just start, reminding yourself that you’ll have time to
change things later. Let the draft be messy and imperfect. Your
main job now is to find through-lines that connect the different
issues raised in your research.
The style of a literature review is
generally concise. You want to convey information quickly, with
a minimum of fuss. The style does not call attention to itself,
but is rather workmanlike. Paragraphs may begin with a topic
sentence, clearly alerting the reader to what will be discussed.
Transitional words and phrases are also very important. Tell the
reader exactly how x relates to y. Transitional
words and phrases are things like: “Likewise…” “On the other
hand…” “Moreover…” “In a similar fashion…” “Even more important
is…” These let the reader know what is coming.
The introduction may be very plain and
bald. This will define the topic under discussion, point out
major trends, summarize conflicting viewpoints, and may explain
the order in which arguments will be discussed. Rather than a
catchy or engaging beginning, the introduction to a literature
can just tell the reader what the paper will discuss and how it
will do it.
The body of the paper puts together all
your research in a logical manner. You may quote from individual
articles or simply paraphrase. Give more details of more
important articles. Others may get a mere mention. Always show
how the pieces of research relate.
The conclusion of your literature review
will summarize your findings. This is also the place to evaluate
your topic overall. Perhaps much more research needs to be done.
So here you may actually be commenting on what hasn’t been
written, as well as on what you’ve read. You may find the
approaches of some of the authors flawed, or that one side of an
issue is dominant, though a less-researched perspective is also
valid. This is the place to make those kinds of judgments. If
your literature review is only part of a bigger project, the
conclusion is the place where you can make the transition to the
rest of it. Or if the literature review is one step, and you
will later write a more analytical paper, you might end with
what problem or issue the literature review has let you
recognize. This can be the most analytical part of the
literature review, where your own critical perspective is
clearly voiced.
|